9th CIRCUIT COURT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

Publication of any unpublished disposition may be requested by letter addressed to the Clerk, stating concisely the reasons for publication. Such a request will not be entertained unless received within 60 days of the issuance of this Court's disposition. A copy of the request for publication must be served on the parties to the case. The parties will have 14 days from the date of service to notify the Court of any objections they may have to the publication of the disposition. If such a request is granted, the unpublished disposition will be redesignated an opinion. (Rev. 12/1/09) 9th Circuit Rule 36-4. Request for Publication

9th Circuit Court UNPUBLISHED DISPOSITIONS

Unpublished opinions are opinions that a court has designated as having non-binding precedential effect. They are written resolutions to specific cases, prepared exclusively for the involved parties, and they are intended to have no binding precedential effect-or even persuasive effect, for some jurisdictions- on future cases. The text of such opinions is usually sparse, containing only a minimal recitation of the facts and a limited description of the law. [Cite]

HEMPFLING V VOYLES

Initially filed as Hempfling v. Voyles this case was changed to Hempfling v Volkmer and deals with the attempt to stop the illegal hold placed on our Superior Court case by a prosecutor. This case is closed and mandated in April of 2018 BUT NO ORDERS HAVE BEEN ISSUED. Docket #30 in this case was missing for a very long time.

HEMPFLING V STANFORD

This case involved the clerk of the Pinal County Superior Court , declaring herself to be above the law and the judge in the case. Quite involved. This case is still open as it relates to the other cases even though it closed as we could not afford the appeal. It had to have been taken up in the Volkmer appeal as that is required by the rules.

HEMPFLING V VOLKMER

This case is the appeal of the original Voyles case. Criminal activity during this trial and the retrial of the Voyles case is just horrible. This case is still open although it closed in April of last year with the mandate to the District Court but was returned to appeals when mail was stolen yet again.

HEMPFLING V CVDC HOLDINGS

This Superior Court case was filed in late 2011. It was illegally held without due process. This case is finished and a LOSS for the DENTISTS.

HEMPFLING V LM COMMUNICATIONS

This case was in the 4th Circuit in Charleston South Carolina in 2004. It moved to the appeal process and then to the Supreme Court and was then placed in another court in 2005 which has been secret ever since. This case is still open. The counter claim involved national security, deep state tactics, lies and corruption deep in the executive branch. This case is locked up and secret.