24pt">size=3D2>2.yes"> The Court noted that an individual =
who was on the payroll, "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
/>
0pt 24pt">size=3D2>but who was not an "employee" =
under traditional agency
style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 12pt 0pt 24pt">style=3D"mso-ansi-language: EN">Unicode MS">principles, would not be counted.style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> Id. at 666.style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> The converse is =
24pt">size=3D2>also true.style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes"> An individual who has two =
joint employers would be
style=3D"MARGIN: 0in 12pt 0pt 24pt">style=3D"mso-ansi-language: EN">Unicode MS">counted as an employee of both employers even though the =
employee
12pt 0pt 24pt">size=3D2>may be on the payroll of only =
one. See EEOC Enforcement =
Guidance
12pt 0pt 24pt">size=3D2>No: N-915, "Concepts of =
Integrated Enterprise and Joint =
24pt">size=3D2>Employer," May 6, =
1987.
24pt">size=3D2>MS">
24pt">size=3D2>MS">