Reply-To: "lkh"
From: "lkh"
To: "BILLY SANDERS"
Subject: Good morning
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:49:16 -0400
Organization: Enticy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00ED_01C36711.15320350"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
Disposition-Notification-To: "lkh"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00ED_01C36711.15320350
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

FYI

no response contact from Ms. Thompson.

But that's ok.

Pretty much all of her complaint was filed in my complaint
as supporting documentation. They may have settled her
complaint but that does not lock up the documents in my
complaint. After all, if that was the case, she referred to
many of my documents in hers. There is no judge in this
land who would prohibit my case just because it was
referenced in her case.

And anyway, the federal judges here declared in 2001
that cases settled in private that involved current cases
will be opened upon request. It was an interesting
article where all 10 federal judges in South Carolina
stated their intention to open any closed file needed to
be made public for another case.

Hope all is well with you.

Lee


------=_NextPart_000_00ED_01C36711.15320350
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



charset=3Diso-8859-1">




FYI

 

no response contact from Ms. =
Thompson.

 

But that's ok.

 

Pretty much all of her complaint was =
filed in my=20
complaint

as supporting documentation. They may =
have settled=20
her

complaint but that does not lock up the =
documents=20
in my

complaint. After all, if that was the =
case, she=20
referred to

many of my documents in hers. There is =
no judge in=20
this

land who would prohibit my case just =
because it=20
was

referenced in her case.

 

And anyway, the federal judges here =
declared in=20
2001

that cases settled in private that =
involved current=20
cases

will be opened upon request. It was an=20
interesting

article where all 10 federal judges in =
South=20
Carolina

stated their intention to open any =
closed file=20
needed to

be made public for another =
case.

 

Hope all is well with you.

 

Lee

 

 


------=_NextPart_000_00ED_01C36711.15320350--