One of the most difficult concepts to understand as applied to the quantum computational
system is the concept of the clock controller. The best method of explanation is to compare it with a conventional
mechanical electronic clock.
          The electronic clock uses an established frequency for counting a relatively accurate number of
repetitions per second. In this example we will use the frequency of 35,000 hertz.
          An electronic (quartz controlled) clock uses a piece of quartz vibrating at 35,000 cycles per
second. The on board computer in the clock counts the repetitions of those vibrations and advances the second
hand one click or one second for each total cycle of the frequency. It further counts the vibrations and upon
acceptance of 60 repetitions of the frequency it will advance the minute hand one click or one minute. It further
counts the repetitions of the frequency total cycles and upon acceptance of 3600 repetitions of the frequency it
will advance the hour hand one click or one hour.
          Of course there are smaller increments counted and shorter clicks measured by an electronic
clock to give the illusion of a rotating hand in the minute and hour hand's movements about the face of the clock
but essentially the function is as depicted above and on figure 9.
          The biological clock does not have an on board computer to count repetitions of frequency cycles.
          It functions in the opposite of the mechanical computer operated quartz clock.
          In the quantum computational system the clock is not used to be counted it is used to set up
wave patterns that are consistent and each a subsequent derivative of the previous count.
          So the quantum computational system's clock process involves once again a single controlling
frequency of 35,000 hertz but no counting of it's repetitions. Increments of it's frequency count are used to control
the wave speeds set up in processing.
          If the quantum computational system's clock process was used in a conventional mechanical
clock the multiplication counter in the computer would be replaced with a division process. Second hands would
advance once each divided cycle of the frequency. Minute hands would advance once each divided cycle of the
frequency and hour hands would likewise advance, The difference would be the frequency.
          Instead of the frequency having been established as a maximum for the minimum time frame it
would have to be established as the minimum for a maximum time frame.
          The example would be: The second hand would advance once each 35,000 waves, the minute
hand would advance once each 2,100,000 waves and the hour hand would advance once each 126,000,000
waves. 
          So our upside down mechanical clock would require a quartz crystal vibrating at 126 megahertz.
Not only would this be a very expensive and cumbersome wrist watch it would be ridiculous to attempt to sell
a watch that operated faster than the speed of the 120 MHZ Pentium computer processor chip. It would be huge
on your wrist and you would have to continuously wave your arm vigorously to try to keep it cool enough to keep 
on your arm.
          It makes about as much sense to build a wrist watch in that fashion as it does to build a quantum
computational system using a conventional clock protocol. 
          So would it also be as ridiculous to assume that the biological clock functions anything like a
conventional clock.
          Cells divide and diminish. It is a process that does not incur multiplication yet the state of the
art of digital computing uses faster and faster clock speeds, multiples of clock speeds and faster and faster
computational speeds to attempt to replicate the analog sine wave function of the brain. Massive amounts of
energy are required to accomplish that task (in relation to the extremely low energy used by the brain) and
massive amounts of heat are generated in the procedure which it is a well known fact that as few as four degrees
difference in the brain can cause death. The brain's processing procedure does not add one additional minuscule
part of a degree to the cell's already established temperature for life.
          A brain's activities are measured by blood flow not temperature. So no reference has been made
to a computational process taking place as no heat is generated by it.