The issue is truth. Lawyers I have run into don’t understand that concept. So let’s explain it.

This lets lawyers, who write the laws, lie in court. See (b) below. Repeal (b) and almost all problems in courts WILL STOP!

18 U.S. Code §?1001. Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1)

falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2)

makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3)

makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

(b)

Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.

(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—

(1)

administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or

(2)

any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.

Lawyers writing laws have then given themselves another get out of jail free card with the perjury charge.

The trick is in the detail of ‘oath’. Have to be under oath to lie. If not under oath, then the courts and lawyers do not seem to care if lies control a case. It is how lawyers keep their jobs.

But when a plaintiff, who is the sole source of ‘truth’ in a case is found and has admitted to being a natural born liar, everything else comes to a halt.

In Row v Wade, the plaintiff Norma McCorvey, lied about everything she said. She has admitted it in her posthumous deceit filled ‘death bed’ confession.

It was KNOWN to the courts before the ruling that Jane Roe was a known liar. NOTHING that lady uttered could be believed. NOTHING!

She has admitted that she did not have an abortion. Ever. The “they won’t let me” excuse is absurd. She only needed to travel to another state that allowed it. So, she DID NOT HAVE STANDING to bring the false, fabricated Roe V Wade case to begin with.

Then the same person recanted the story, fell head over heals into religion and then in her ‘documentary’ has proceeded to admit that was all a lie too.

That means the plaintiff is, was and shall ever be totally unable to be believed in ANY testimony , all the way back to her first arrest for theft.

THAT is an avenue that screams FRAUD UPON THE COURT. That makes the Roe v Wade Judgment VOID! It is only a matter of a judge agreeing with the truth.

Where is the lawyer who will take this to the United States Supreme Court?

See #4 below. There is NO time limit. There is NO restriction. A Judgment made based on fraud (lies for money) is VOID!

Rule 60. Relief from a Judgment or Order

Primary tabs

(a) Corrections Based on Clerical Mistakes; Oversights and Omissions. The court may correct a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or other part of the record. The court may do so on motion or on its own, with or without notice. But after an appeal has been docketed in the appellate court and while it is pending, such a mistake may be corrected only with the appellate court’s leave.

(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;

(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);

(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;

(4) the judgment is void;

(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or

(6) any other reason that justifies relief.

(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time—and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.

(2) Effect on Finality. The motion does not affect the judgment’s finality or suspend its operation.

(d) Other Powers to Grant Relief. This rule does not limit a court’s power to:

(1) entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or proceeding;

(2) grant relief under 28 U.S.C. §1655 to a defendant who was not personally notified of the action; or

(3) set aside a judgment for fraud on the court.

(e) Bills and Writs Abolished. The following are abolished: bills of review, bills in the nature of bills of review, and writs of coram nobis, coram vobis, and audita querela.

The lady could not tell the truth. Ever. There can be no more need proof of a total con job than her admission of being a con artist and admitting that both stories she told were lies. She was paid by both sides to stay with them. And just like her never having had an abortion.. she never had character either.

But… alas… this topic will not be the topic that ends Row v Wade. That will happen when life makes an appearance.

A thing that is alive is not life. Life is what makes the thing be alive. If life was not present before the thing that is alive, it could never be, alive.

Proof is all that remains.