• HOME
    • LEGAL CASES
    • ABOUT
    • LEGAL
    • Science
    • Arizona
    • SCOTUS
    • STUFF
    • BROADCASTING
  • HOME
  • LEGAL CASES
    • The Constitution And Bill of Rights
    • GOOGLE
      • The Alphabeti Prophecy
        • The Video The Alphabeti Prophecy
      • GOOGLE CAUGHT CENSORING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
      • UNCOVERING THE SECRET GOOGLE WORLD OF CORRUPT SEARCH CENSORSHIP
      • GOOGLE IS AT IT AGAIN! THIS TIME “GARLAND SHREVES” CENSORS SEARCH RESULTS
      • The Significance of Google’s STOPPING Censorship of the US Courts
      • With the Upcoming Revelation of what GOOGLE has Really Been Doing… UNVEILING THE EVIL.
      • Search the Censorship
      • GOOGLE: THIS IS A BALD FACE LIE!
      • Arizona Libertarian Congressional Candidate Investigates Google News Scandal. Google’s Algorithm Gives Them Up!
      • CRIMINAL RICO: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968
    • USPS
      • UPDATED: BOMBSHELL NEWS COMING SOON!
      • Deputy Postmaster General FIRED!!!!! Postmaster General Forced to Retire
      • The U.S. Post Office Criminal Theft Ring NOW WITH VIDEO
      • SCANDAL The U.S. Postal Service: Where is the press conference announcing the busting up of a nationwide bribery ring INSIDE THE POSTAL SERVICE?
      • Post Office Laws You NEED to Know
      • Where did all the ballots go?
      • HOW MAIL IN BALLOTS ARE STOLEN
      • The United States Post Office Scandal: Is Google hiding the crimes?
      • The United States Postal Service MUST be Privatized
    • 4TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
      • INFORMATION FOR DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • THE LINDSEY GRAHAM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST THAT WAS IGNORED IN 2004
      • South Carolina FBI Field Office Covers Up Federal Offenses In RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • The NAACP’s Back Door to the EEOC
      • Hempfling v. L.M. Communications Complaint
      • THE INCRIMINATING REFERENCE LETTER OF TRISH THOMPSON
      • Fourth Circuit All Case Files Archive Collection
      • LISTEN: AUDIO OF A MEETING WHERE ADMISSION IS MADE OF ILLEGAL ACTS
      • LISTEN: THIS IS THE MIDDAY TALENT I WAS TRYING TO HIRE. A BLACK FEMALE REFUSED EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE SHE WAS BLACK!
      • What Deep State National Security Threat ended my Radio Career?
      • The Original 2004 Law Suit LM Communications DEEP STATE
      • Complaint Before The Federal Communications Commission
      • FBI COMPLAINT
    • COUNTY CLERK CASE
      • Hempfling v Stanford
      • Federal Lawsuit Uncovers Government Corruption in Arizona County Superior Court Clerk’s Office
      • AMANDA STANFORD VIOLATES 1ST AMENDMENT AND COURT RULING
      • Press Release Full Hempfling v Stanford
      • Press Release Short Hempfling v Stanford
    • SUPERIOR COURT CASE
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
      • PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION 2013 AZ Appeals
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • DENTAL BOARD COMPLAINT
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
    • The Rule of Law
    • 9TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • 9th Circuit Cases
      • Interactive Timeline
      • GOT RIGHTS? What are YOU Worth?
      • NO GAG ORDER! ARIZONA: Do I stay quiet or spill what I know?
      • Who is Garland Shreves and Why is he Moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer?
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • What You Do NOT KNOW!
      • KENT VOLKMER
        • DEMAND THAT KENT VOLKMER RESIGN AS PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY!
        • UPDATE: DEMAND PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY KENT VOLKMER RESIGN!
        • In The Spirit of Equal Opportunity BULLS__T: Kent Volkmer’s BACKGROUNDER
      • MICHAEL G. BAILEY
        • WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT FILED 9/25/2019 DOJ OIG CRIMINAL COVERUP IN ARIZONA
      • MARK BRNOVICH
        • Mark Brnovich MUST RESIGN NOW!
        • March 25, 2014 Prosecutorial Misconduct FIVE YEARS LATER
        • ARIZONA: What is the difference between conflict of interest and obstruction of justice?
        • ARIZONA STATE GOVERNMENT ORDERED CENSORSHIP AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WITH GOOGLE
        • Chief Law Enforcement Officer SHOULD BE IN FEDERAL PRISON SINCE APRIL 2018
      • ONLY IN AMERICA
      • Case Advisory
      • Must Have Hit A Nerve
      • Case Background
      • 9th Circuit COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT PREVENTIVE INJUNCTION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • Timeline Court Cases 2009 to Today
      • Who’s Who in Hempfling V. Volkmer
      • Federal Lawsuit: Government Corruption in Arizona Pinal County Court Clerk’s Office
      • The big #PinalCounty news so far this week has been:
      • Pinal County 60 Day Notice
    • EXPOSING Operation High Grid
    • NO GAG ORDER: Read the actual court docket document that ends ARIZONA political careers!
    • Press Release COSC
  • ABOUT
    • About
    • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
    • Family Lineage
    • Content by Keyword
    • Privacy Policy
    • Image Gallery
    • WRITING
    • Multiple Legal Cases Interactive Timeline
    • Hear The Heartbeat The Real Lesson From Christmas
      • “Lee Kent” Hempfling Resume & History
    • Words Blog
    • COURT DOCKETS
    • Every HTML Character You Ever Wanted
      • CORPORATE SENSE RANDOM PHRASE MAKER
    • If you really have to contact…
    • BROADCASTING
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • More Images (Science Stuff)
  • LEGAL
    • JUSTICE
    • Lee Kent Hempfling v. Department of Justice – in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux.
  • Science
  • Arizona
  • SCOTUS
    • Case Finder: Quick Searches
    • Press Coverage
  • STUFF
    • NEWS WATCH
    • Ye Old Iggit.Com
    • Daily IDENTITY ASSIGNER
  • BROADCASTING

Lee Kent Hempfling Logic Matters

Home /Arizona, CORRUPTION/Who is Garland Shreves and Why is he Moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer?
Arizona

Who is Garland Shreves and Why is he Moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer?

August 31, 2019 3

So what is it about this article? October 22, 2023. You don’t think I’ve been watching do you? Do you have any idea where the LatLon of 38°53’43.4″N 77°02’22.2″W is? Do you perhaps know why that specific location has been visiting this site and this page every month since September and now is playing watch me access. Twice each hour since 10PM last night. OK to save you the time, that LatLon is the exact location of the corner of 17th and E St NW Washington DC.  Here.

UPDATE FEB 2020:  See the new information that tells the story of WHY it appears this man holds this position. THERE IS HISTORY HERE!!!

SEE the follow up answer HERE and right here!

Back on August 31, 2019 the article Who Is Garland Shreves And Why Is He Moonlighting As Chief Of Staff To Kent Volkmer was published. It has been quite busy ever since. And it felt alone. Like it was abandoned. Like it was forgotten. That ‘why’ needed answering.

So….

On March 7, 2015 InMaricopa published https://www.inmaricopa.com/opposition-to-college-tax-hike-goes-to-court/

“Garland Shreves is accusing the board of violating Open Meeting law at its May 19 meeting and failing to provide the Truth in Taxation notice for its June 9 meeting. Ultimately, he wants to clear out most of the board and unseat the college president.”

“Shreves, chairman of the group Citizens for Fair Taxation (CFFT), said he is taking the case to court himself because he did not want to wait for the complaint process between the County Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General.”

So not wanting to wait: on June 25, 2015 Garland Shreves filed suit to against CENTRAL ARIZONA COLLEGE to get rid of their board. S-1100-CV-201501190 SHREVES VS PINAL CO COMM COLL. Attorney Kent P. Volkmer of the Wallace, Volkmer & Weagant law practice filed the action. It didn’t take long.

“If a judge agrees with that interpretation and affirms the board violated the Truth in Taxation law, the college board would not be allowed to raise the rate at all this fiscal year, which ends June 30, 2016. Superior Court Judge Jason Holmberg will hear the case. The hearing to show cause is set for Aug. 10 at 9 a.m.” For background: “Shreves’ definitive goal and the reason he formed Citizens for Fair Taxation [CFFT] was to remove the other four members of the board: Board President Gladys Christensen (who is said to have had Shreves escorted from a room by an armed guard), Rita Nader, Rick Gibson and Jack Yarrington. He wants to replace them with board members who are fiscally conservative. He said he also wants the college to replace Helmich and Vice President of Finance Chris Wodka.”

Well, after a motion to dismiss: Jan 26, 2016 case is thrown out with prejudice!

Apparently still not wanting to “wait for the complaint process between the County Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General” on May 23, 2016 Volkmer seems to continue to represent Shreves and starts http://kentvolkmer.com to run for County Attorney’s position. He won.

On Jan 3, 2017 Kent Volkmer was sworn in as County Attorney.

He hired Garland Shreves as Chief of Staff.

https://centralaz.edu/about-cac/governance/board-of-governors/ tells us that Board President Gladys Christensen is STILL THE BOSS. Rick Gibson is still there.

So perhaps now we know a bit more about Garland Shreves and why he moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer. Of course, maybe we don’t it all.


 

Prior to this piece I have never mentioned a staff member who is not an attorney and directly involved in the cases this site is all about. That changes. Now!

The Pinal County Attorney’s Office lied and refused service of process for the final challenge in Federal Court. Who was responsible for that?

Look at this: https://www.linkedin.com/in/garland-shreves-a1381515/

Garland Shreves is the founder and current CEO of Research for Life. OK!

Garland Shreves is chief of staff for the Pinal County Attorney’s Office. WTF?

Now why would he have removed his social network account?  oh well… never mind… see the news about Mr. Shreves.

No wait…  he got rid of them all………. well not all… THIS is his account on Twitter but it is obviously purged back to 2014. (Purging social network accounts seems to be a ‘thing’ for Arizona politicans.)

So how about videos? Anybody who makes a Youtube account does it to put up a video. Hmmmm….

Nothing.. hmmm.. so what has he liked on Youbetube? The ‘likes’ really show what a person is interested in.

How tequila is made; travel to Brasil; block ads on an iphone 7; some music (country – good taste too!); Ways to help increase value of your business and …. huh?  HOW TO DELETE YOUTUBE VIDEOS…………. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm  there is the #pinalcounty #arizona purge accounts problem again.

 

And now we come to the reason for this article:

The last document the Pinal County Attorney’s office had to respond to in federal court, was not responded to by Pinal County, or the State of Arizona for that matter. It was ignored by the state and flat out lied about by the county (and the filing was stolen in the mail) . How was that a lie? Someone, and it is most logically the Chief of Staff or Volkmer himself or it could be Costello or it could be a totally inept clerk (sure), refused service by declaring that the attorney it was addressed to ( Kevin Costello working there since 2013 and registered as the appearing counsel!) did not work at the Pinal County Attorney’s Office. The recipient was ‘unknown’ to that office. Even when the same Costello was before the federal court in the case being refused and STILL IS!

Here is the envelope they refused and the stamps put upon it. This is the first time the entire envelope has been presented publicly. The court cut off the tracking numbers in their copy when it was placed on the docket.

You’ll notice the misspelling of “Pinal County Attorney’s Office”. The reason was not a mistake. “Pinal County Attonrey’s Office” was the exact spelling used by Kevin Costello when he appeared in the case and it is contained ON THE APPEALS DOCKET to this day.

The answer to why it was refused has a lot to do with the mail being stolen and obviously somebody decided it was prudent to stop digging the hole. Since the state received the filing before the county and did not refuse it, the state told the county what was in it and that ended the case. It was good to see Costello fold like a cheap suit, even though they swore to the Postal Service they never heard of the guy. So who did that refusal, of a court filing sent to a PO BOX: that took a day to think it over before returning it to sender (bad mistake dummies) ??? hmmm???

The question remains and needs answering.

WHY is Garland Shreves the Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer AND the current CEO of Research For Life, a company that does business in the same county the CEO is running the LAW IN?

I know the answer to that question.

Altogether now… can we say Mohave?

Constitution and Bill of Rights
CONSTITUTION
Enticy Institute
Enticy Institute
American Health Care
American Health Care
IQ Test
IQ TEST

Categories

Subscribe To Updates

Notifications when something posts.
Loading

History

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

Search

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

Most Excellent Keyword Things

are (176) Arizona (85) attorney (76) case (110) circuit (74) court (111) did (103) do (99) does (116) Don (79) even (98) federal (84) government (83) have (122) Hempfling (75) I (127) just (129) know (115) law (90) like (100) long (80) means (77) nbsp (106) new (85) no (167) office (94) order (81) people (111) Person (101) process (85) public (74) right (87) see (112) State (105) States (105) stop (74) thing (97) think (78) time (132) United (90) United States (88) use (96) used (94) v (87) years (98)
Copyright © 1992 - 2025 Lee Kent Hempfling All Rights Reserved
Copyrights are owned by the respective creator. Uses are by fair use parody.