Bing: Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?
Yahoo: Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?
Google: Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?
DogPile: Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?
DuckDUckGo: Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?
[reporters-guide]
  • LEGAL CASES
  • ABOUT
  • LEGAL
  • Missing Domains
  • Science
  • Arizona
  • How To Prove Republican Politicians and Pundits are Stupid!
  • SCOTUS
  • STUFF
  • in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux. SCOTUS 22-6734
  • Ye Ol’ Enticypress
  • Ex Genere Test
Lee Kent Hempfling Logic Matters
  • LEGAL CASES
    • The Constitution And Bill of Rights
    • GOOGLE
      • The Alphabeti Prophecy
        • The Video The Alphabeti Prophecy
      • GOOGLE CAUGHT CENSORING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
      • UNCOVERING THE SECRET GOOGLE WORLD OF CORRUPT SEARCH CENSORSHIP
      • GOOGLE IS AT IT AGAIN! THIS TIME “GARLAND SHREVES” CENSORS SEARCH RESULTS
      • The Significance of Google’s STOPPING Censorship of the US Courts
      • With the Upcoming Revelation of what GOOGLE has Really Been Doing… UNVEILING THE EVIL.
      • Search the Censorship
      • GOOGLE: THIS IS A BALD FACE LIE!
      • Arizona Libertarian Congressional Candidate Investigates Google News Scandal. Google’s Algorithm Gives Them Up!
      • CRIMINAL RICO: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968
    • USPS
      • UPDATED: BOMBSHELL NEWS COMING SOON!
      • Deputy Postmaster General FIRED!!!!! Postmaster General Forced to Retire
      • The U.S. Post Office Criminal Theft Ring NOW WITH VIDEO
      • SCANDAL The U.S. Postal Service: Where is the press conference announcing the busting up of a nationwide bribery ring INSIDE THE POSTAL SERVICE?
      • Post Office Laws You NEED to Know
      • Where did all the ballots go?
      • HOW MAIL IN BALLOTS ARE STOLEN
      • The United States Post Office Scandal: Is Google hiding the crimes?
      • The United States Postal Service MUST be Privatized
    • 4TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
      • INFORMATION FOR DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • THE LINDSEY GRAHAM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST THAT WAS IGNORED IN 2004
      • South Carolina FBI Field Office Covers Up Federal Offenses In RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • The NAACP’s Back Door to the EEOC
      • Hempfling v. L.M. Communications Complaint
      • THE INCRIMINATING REFERENCE LETTER OF TRISH THOMPSON
      • Fourth Circuit All Case Files Archive Collection
      • LISTEN: AUDIO OF A MEETING WHERE ADMISSION IS MADE OF ILLEGAL ACTS
      • LISTEN: THIS IS THE MIDDAY TALENT I WAS TRYING TO HIRE. A BLACK FEMALE REFUSED EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE SHE WAS BLACK!
      • What Deep State National Security Threat ended my Radio Career?
      • The Original 2004 Law Suit LM Communications DEEP STATE
      • Complaint Before The Federal Communications Commission
      • FBI COMPLAINT
    • COUNTY CLERK CASE
      • Hempfling v Stanford
      • Federal Lawsuit Uncovers Government Corruption in Arizona County Superior Court Clerk’s Office
      • AMANDA STANFORD VIOLATES 1ST AMENDMENT AND COURT RULING
      • Press Release Full Hempfling v Stanford
      • Press Release Short Hempfling v Stanford
    • SUPERIOR COURT CASE
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
      • PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION 2013 AZ Appeals
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • DENTAL BOARD COMPLAINT
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
    • The Rule of Law
    • 9TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • 9th Circuit Cases
      • Interactive Timeline
      • GOT RIGHTS? What are YOU Worth?
      • NO GAG ORDER! ARIZONA: Do I stay quiet or spill what I know?
      • Who is Garland Shreves and Why is he Moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer?
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • What You Do NOT KNOW!
      • KENT VOLKMER
        • DEMAND THAT KENT VOLKMER RESIGN AS PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY!
        • UPDATE: DEMAND PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY KENT VOLKMER RESIGN!
        • In The Spirit of Equal Opportunity BULLS__T: Kent Volkmer’s BACKGROUNDER
      • MICHAEL G. BAILEY
        • WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT FILED 9/25/2019 DOJ OIG CRIMINAL COVERUP IN ARIZONA
      • MARK BRNOVICH
        • Mark Brnovich MUST RESIGN NOW!
        • March 25, 2014 Prosecutorial Misconduct FIVE YEARS LATER
        • ARIZONA: What is the difference between conflict of interest and obstruction of justice?
        • ARIZONA STATE GOVERNMENT ORDERED CENSORSHIP AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WITH GOOGLE
        • Chief Law Enforcement Officer SHOULD BE IN FEDERAL PRISON SINCE APRIL 2018
      • ONLY IN AMERICA
      • Case Advisory
      • Must Have Hit A Nerve
      • Case Background
      • 9th Circuit COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT PREVENTIVE INJUNCTION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • Timeline Court Cases 2009 to Today
      • Who’s Who in Hempfling V. Volkmer
      • Federal Lawsuit: Government Corruption in Arizona Pinal County Court Clerk’s Office
      • The big #PinalCounty news so far this week has been:
      • Pinal County 60 Day Notice
    • EXPOSING Operation High Grid
    • NO GAG ORDER: Read the actual court docket document that ends ARIZONA political careers!
    • Press Release COSC
  • ABOUT
    • About
    • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
    • Family Lineage
    • Content by Keyword
    • Privacy Policy
    • Image Gallery
    • WRITING
    • Multiple Legal Cases Interactive Timeline
    • Hear The Heartbeat The Real Lesson From Christmas
      • “Lee Kent” Hempfling Resume & History
    • Words Blog
    • COURT DOCKETS
    • Every HTML Character You Ever Wanted
      • CORPORATE SENSE RANDOM PHRASE MAKER
    • If you really have to contact…
    • BROADCASTING
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • More Images (Science Stuff)
  • LEGAL
    • JUSTICE
    • Lee Kent Hempfling v. Department of Justice – in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux.
  • Missing Domains
    • MEMEORIES
  • Science
  • Arizona
  • How To Prove Republican Politicians and Pundits are Stupid!
  • SCOTUS
    • Case Finder: Quick Searches
    • Press Coverage
  • STUFF
    • NEWS WATCH
    • Ye Old Iggit.Com
    • Daily IDENTITY ASSIGNER
  • in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux. SCOTUS 22-6734
    • Fourth Circuit Images
    • Read FREE: The Brain is A Wonderful Thing
  • Ye Ol’ Enticypress
  • Ex Genere Test

Tags archive: talks are only discussions

Home /Tag:talks are only discussions
CORRUPTION

Why Did Democrats Choose Quid Pro Quo To Go After Trump?

October 23, 2019 0

Just look at what it means: “something given or received for something else also : a deal arranging a quid pro quo” What then is…

Constitution and Bill of Rights
CONSTITUTION
Stolen Justice
Stolen Justice
Country Above Self
Country Above Self
Enticy Institute
Enticy Institute
American Health Care
American Health Care
American Health Care
IQ TEST

Categories

Subscribe To Updates

Notifications when something posts.
Loading

History

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

Search

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

Most Excellent Keyword Things

are (161) Arizona (80) attorney (75) case (107) circuit (69) court (103) did (96) do (84) does (107) Don (69) even (91) federal (83) good (67) government (79) have (106) Hempfling (70) I (114) just (117) know (105) law (85) like (89) long (71) means (73) nbsp (94) new (78) no (151) office (88) order (79) people (101) Person (97) process (79) public (71) right (82) see (102) State (101) States (98) thing (85) think (70) time (119) United (84) United States (82) use (90) used (87) v (80) years (88)
1992-2022 Lee Kent Hempfling. All rights reserved. Created by Macho Themes