MARCH 25, 2014 was a Tuesday.
On that day , former Judge Bradley M. Soos *
of the Arizona Superior Court in Pinal County placed an illegal hold,
with total failure to comply with existing laws and rules and procedures,
on a medical (dental) malpractice case that had judgment entered on May 3, 2012.
The case was a default against the defendants, Canyon Vista Dental Care , its fake sister companies and FOUR dentists and more. BECAUSE OF BRIBERY!
No orders that could be appealed were ever issued. The stay, that illegal hold, violated FRCP 62.
Rule 62. Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment
(a) Automatic Stay. Except as provided in Rule 62(c) and (d), execution on a judgment and proceedings to enforce it are stayed for 30 days after its entry, unless the court orders otherwise.
(b) Stay by Bond or Other Security. At any time after judgment is entered, a party may obtain a stay by providing a bond or other security. The stay takes effect when the court approves the bond or other security and remains in effect for the time specified in the bond or other security.
(c) Stay of an Injunction, Receivership, or Patent Accounting Order. Unless the court orders otherwise, the following are not stayed after being entered, even if an appeal is taken:
(1) an interlocutory or final judgment in an action for an injunction or receivership; or
(2) a judgment or order that directs an accounting in an action for patent infringement.
(d) Injunction Pending an Appeal. While an appeal is pending from an interlocutory order or final judgment that grants, continues, modifies, refuses, dissolves, or refuses to dissolve or modify an injunction, the court may suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction on terms for bond or other terms that secure the opposing party’s rights. If the judgment appealed from is rendered by a statutory three-judge district court, the order must be made either:
(1) by that court sitting in open session; or
(2) by the assent of all its judges, as evidenced by their signatures.
(e) Stay Without Bond on an Appeal by the United States, Its Officers, or Its Agencies. The court must not require a bond, obligation, or other security from the appellant when granting a stay on an appeal by the United States, its officers, or its agencies or on an appeal directed by a department of the federal government.
(f) Stay in Favor of a Judgment Debtor Under State Law. If a judgment is a lien on the judgment debtor’s property under the law of the state where the court is located, the judgment debtor is entitled to the same stay of execution the state court would give.
(g) Appellate Court’s Power Not Limited. This rule does not limit the power of the appellate court or one of its judges or justices:
(1) to stay proceedings—or suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction—while an appeal is pending; or
(2) to issue an order to preserve the status quo or the effectiveness of the judgment to be entered.
(h) Stay with Multiple Claims or Parties. A court may stay the enforcement of a final judgment entered under Rule 54(b) until it enters a later judgment or judgments, and may prescribe terms necessary to secure the benefit of the stayed judgment for the party in whose favor it was entered.
NOT ONE requirement of Rule 62 was met, yet the case came to a screeching halt. We had just managed to remove it from the Second District of the Arizona Appeals Court in Tuscon and it was just sent back to the Superior Court with the order to complete what was needed to end the case.
That never happened. The order stopping the case also prohibited any filing of a motion to restart the case. It seems the case was stopped because the parallel criminal investigation into what caused the bribery in the Pinal County Clerk’s Office had grown. It even opened the eyes of investigators to other things and other cases and those other things and other cases have held us up ever since. It has just gotten worse. State and county attorneys committing crimes AGAINST THE 9TH CIRCUIT COURT DURING TRIAL!!! all to stop the release of the WIN we fought for.
A SECOND TIME!
We sued in Federal Court and after quite a bit of additional illegal activity inside the trial by the defendants we won! By default.
That win was stopped by crimes we reported to the court. All of those are detailed on the appeals court docket.
They are also detailed in a letter to Associate Justice Elana Kagen (a person we have grown to admire) and in a reported collection in a complaint filed with the DOJ IG office against Michael G. Bailey, the current U.S. Attorney for Arizona who was totally in control of all criminal activity attacking the United States Courts before he was appointed by President Trump.
The deep state lives deeply in states as well as the federal government and they have tools you do not have. Tools they should all be in prison for using.
The United States Post Office:
Well connected politicians and business people and lawyers of every stripe had a service available to them where they could stop any piece of mail from being delivered. They could also intercept any piece of mail and tell the ‘buyer’ what the mail said before the recipient ever got it. This is caught, detailed and settled in both the 9th Circuit and the 4th Circuit courts.
GOOGLE:
Well connected politicians and business people and lawyers of every stripe had a service available to them where they could have anything they wanted hidden, to be hidden from public view through on line search. Google, working with Lumen Database provided the corrupt with the reputation management services they kept insisting they did not do. Lumen and Google were caught, proven to have censored the United States of American AND US! and it is all detailed on the appeals court docket, as well as whatever the internal investigation by the Court turned up.
ALL of this is just sitting.
Wednesday March 25, 2020 will mark SIX (6) years since that initial illegal hold and THREE AND ONE HALF YEARS since the District Court put an end to it. But it has never stopped.
So while the QAnons are all following the hype of hope and the belief that lazy federal prosecutors who have no concern whatsoever in breaking the very laws they are sworn to enforce will actually DO ANYTHING…
Then wonder: HOW IS IT THAT THE WIVES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA (NOW A FEDERAL JUDGE) and THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR ARIZONA (a Maricopa County Judge UP FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE APPEALS COURT) DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEIR HUSBANDS HAVE BEEN DOING ??? BREAKING LAWS THROUGH AN ENTIRE FEDERAL APPEALS CASE??????? Judge Susan Brnovich and Judge Cynthia Bailey HAVE NO EXCUSE TO KNOWING THESE THINGS AND YET THEY STILL REMAIN ON THE BENCH.
Try waiting SIX YEARS for a case worth over $70,000,000.00 ! Plus interest.
And while your waiting. Try waiting FIFTEEN YEARS AND NINE MONTHS for a case that blew the DOJ, FBI, EEOC, FCC, NAACP AND SOUTH CAROLINA POLITICIANS wide open.
For the love of this country!
BUT DAMN IT … THAT’S ENOUGH!
- = Bradley M. Soos was a judge pro tempore on the Pinal County Superior Court in Arizona. He was appointed to the position in December 2006 by the chief justice of the Arizona Supreme Court. He is now Chief Deputy County Attorney in Gila County, Arizona. Having read his work at length; having argued with him for months: we can state Mr Soos is a good man! He served as a fair Judge. We firmly believe, as Judge, he was the victim of both the Arizona State Attorney General’s Office and the U.S. Attorney’s office. We sued him as well, but dropped his involvement.