• HOME
    • LEGAL CASES
    • ABOUT
    • LEGAL
    • Science
    • Arizona
    • SCOTUS
    • STUFF
    • BROADCASTING
  • HOME
  • LEGAL CASES
    • The Constitution And Bill of Rights
    • GOOGLE
      • The Alphabeti Prophecy
        • The Video The Alphabeti Prophecy
      • GOOGLE CAUGHT CENSORING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
      • UNCOVERING THE SECRET GOOGLE WORLD OF CORRUPT SEARCH CENSORSHIP
      • GOOGLE IS AT IT AGAIN! THIS TIME “GARLAND SHREVES” CENSORS SEARCH RESULTS
      • The Significance of Google’s STOPPING Censorship of the US Courts
      • With the Upcoming Revelation of what GOOGLE has Really Been Doing… UNVEILING THE EVIL.
      • Search the Censorship
      • GOOGLE: THIS IS A BALD FACE LIE!
      • Arizona Libertarian Congressional Candidate Investigates Google News Scandal. Google’s Algorithm Gives Them Up!
      • CRIMINAL RICO: 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968
    • USPS
      • UPDATED: BOMBSHELL NEWS COMING SOON!
      • Deputy Postmaster General FIRED!!!!! Postmaster General Forced to Retire
      • The U.S. Post Office Criminal Theft Ring NOW WITH VIDEO
      • SCANDAL The U.S. Postal Service: Where is the press conference announcing the busting up of a nationwide bribery ring INSIDE THE POSTAL SERVICE?
      • Post Office Laws You NEED to Know
      • Where did all the ballots go?
      • HOW MAIL IN BALLOTS ARE STOLEN
      • The United States Post Office Scandal: Is Google hiding the crimes?
      • The United States Postal Service MUST be Privatized
    • 4TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
      • INFORMATION FOR DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • THE LINDSEY GRAHAM FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST THAT WAS IGNORED IN 2004
      • South Carolina FBI Field Office Covers Up Federal Offenses In RACE BASED DIRECT ACTION CASE
      • The NAACP’s Back Door to the EEOC
      • Hempfling v. L.M. Communications Complaint
      • THE INCRIMINATING REFERENCE LETTER OF TRISH THOMPSON
      • Fourth Circuit All Case Files Archive Collection
      • LISTEN: AUDIO OF A MEETING WHERE ADMISSION IS MADE OF ILLEGAL ACTS
      • LISTEN: THIS IS THE MIDDAY TALENT I WAS TRYING TO HIRE. A BLACK FEMALE REFUSED EMPLOYMENT BECAUSE SHE WAS BLACK!
      • What Deep State National Security Threat ended my Radio Career?
      • The Original 2004 Law Suit LM Communications DEEP STATE
      • Complaint Before The Federal Communications Commission
      • FBI COMPLAINT
    • COUNTY CLERK CASE
      • Hempfling v Stanford
      • Federal Lawsuit Uncovers Government Corruption in Arizona County Superior Court Clerk’s Office
      • AMANDA STANFORD VIOLATES 1ST AMENDMENT AND COURT RULING
      • Press Release Full Hempfling v Stanford
      • Press Release Short Hempfling v Stanford
    • SUPERIOR COURT CASE
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
      • PETITION FOR SPECIAL ACTION 2013 AZ Appeals
      • DENTAL MALPRACTICE, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT JUNE 6, 2011
      • DENTAL BOARD COMPLAINT
      • MOTION FOR STAY AND IMMEDIATE JUDGEMENT 2011
    • The Rule of Law
    • 9TH CIRCUIT CASE
      • 9th Circuit Cases
      • Interactive Timeline
      • GOT RIGHTS? What are YOU Worth?
      • NO GAG ORDER! ARIZONA: Do I stay quiet or spill what I know?
      • Who is Garland Shreves and Why is he Moonlighting as Chief of Staff to Kent Volkmer?
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • What You Do NOT KNOW!
      • KENT VOLKMER
        • DEMAND THAT KENT VOLKMER RESIGN AS PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY!
        • UPDATE: DEMAND PINAL COUNTY ATTORNEY KENT VOLKMER RESIGN!
        • In The Spirit of Equal Opportunity BULLS__T: Kent Volkmer’s BACKGROUNDER
      • MICHAEL G. BAILEY
        • WHISTLE-BLOWER COMPLAINT FILED 9/25/2019 DOJ OIG CRIMINAL COVERUP IN ARIZONA
      • MARK BRNOVICH
        • Mark Brnovich MUST RESIGN NOW!
        • March 25, 2014 Prosecutorial Misconduct FIVE YEARS LATER
        • ARIZONA: What is the difference between conflict of interest and obstruction of justice?
        • ARIZONA STATE GOVERNMENT ORDERED CENSORSHIP AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WITH GOOGLE
        • Chief Law Enforcement Officer SHOULD BE IN FEDERAL PRISON SINCE APRIL 2018
      • ONLY IN AMERICA
      • Case Advisory
      • Must Have Hit A Nerve
      • Case Background
      • 9th Circuit COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR PERMANENT PREVENTIVE INJUNCTION AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
      • Why Garland Shreves is Moonlighting as Chief of Staff for Kent Volkmer in Pinal County Arizona
      • Timeline Court Cases 2009 to Today
      • Who’s Who in Hempfling V. Volkmer
      • Federal Lawsuit: Government Corruption in Arizona Pinal County Court Clerk’s Office
      • The big #PinalCounty news so far this week has been:
      • Pinal County 60 Day Notice
    • EXPOSING Operation High Grid
    • NO GAG ORDER: Read the actual court docket document that ends ARIZONA political careers!
    • Press Release COSC
  • ABOUT
    • About
    • Audio Video Demo Airchecks Video Format
    • Family Lineage
    • Content by Keyword
    • Privacy Policy
    • Image Gallery
    • WRITING
    • Multiple Legal Cases Interactive Timeline
    • Hear The Heartbeat The Real Lesson From Christmas
      • “Lee Kent” Hempfling Resume & History
    • Words Blog
    • COURT DOCKETS
    • Every HTML Character You Ever Wanted
      • CORPORATE SENSE RANDOM PHRASE MAKER
    • If you really have to contact…
    • BROADCASTING
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • More Images (Science Stuff)
  • LEGAL
    • JUSTICE
    • Lee Kent Hempfling v. Department of Justice – in Re: Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux.
  • Science
  • Arizona
  • SCOTUS
    • Case Finder: Quick Searches
    • Press Coverage
  • STUFF
    • NEWS WATCH
    • Ye Old Iggit.Com
    • Daily IDENTITY ASSIGNER
  • BROADCASTING

Lee Kent Hempfling Logic Matters

Home /Arizona, CORRUPTION/In The Spirit of Equal Opportunity BULLSHIT: Kent Volkmer’s BACKGROUNDER
Arizona

In The Spirit of Equal Opportunity BULLSHIT: Kent Volkmer’s BACKGROUNDER

August 30, 2019 2

Back on July 19, 2019 the newly minted, over zealous press czar for the Arizona Attorney General’s Office wrote and published, under the by-line of a reporter what is commonly referred to as “BACKGROUND”.

That article was a waste of time to provide background and cuddly warm snuggles for AG Mark Brnovich. It was published too soon. It has dropped out of the first page of Google News.

But don’t let a good strategy go to waste… enter the SECOND DEFENDANT to create a background piece so reporters seeking his information have him to rely on.

Back on the 20th of July the piece https://leehempfling.com/corruption/public-corruption-and-the-arizona-attorney-general-spokesman/ was covered here after publication at https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2019/07/19/public-corruption-tough-to-prove-without-smoking-gun/ anything to help make criminals look good.

So here is Kent Volkmer’s attempt at covering his ass!

Q&A with Pinal County Attorney Kent Volkmer (VIDEO)

How well did he do it? Well here he is talking about how he needs to look really good. Won’t work!

There are a few questions the little attorney-man was not asked and should have been:

1: What is the penalty for knowing the content of a stolen piece of US Mail?

Oh that’s ok Kent, don’t answer; here it is “Stealing other peoples mail is a Federal Crime(a Felony)The Penalty for stealing mail is up to 5 years in jail and a $250,000 fine.” And knowing what was in it is the same as stealing it. Isn’t it Attorney-Man?!?!

2: What is the burden of proof in a civil trial?

Never mind Kent: “Burden of proof is the most important rule of evidence in the trial of civil cases. Generally, burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show by a “preponderance of evidence” or “weight of evidence” that all the facts necessary to win a judgment are probably true.”

3: What is it you and Mark Brnovich and Amanda Stanford were caught doing at the same time?

Yes, in court!  No, besides the overtly stealing of US Court Mail you and the other ‘defendants’ from two different federal cases were caught changing, editing deleting social network account contents, some of which is quoted in local newspapers and no longer there. The only reason all of you were cleaning your history was a specific case was expected to be published when you read what only an attorney in the 9th circuit could have known. You were caught. See #2 above! And you could not respond to the court’s knowing what you did. You refused to take part in the trial after your attorney was caught submitting known lies and standing ground on perjury.

4: One last question Kent: Why have you not resigned yet?

That has not happened for one good reason. Civil vs Criminal. Kent, you and your co-defendants may not go to prison for knowing the content of that mail, but you will suffer the consequences in federal civil court.

So, there it is!

Now, a reporter can find this “out of his league ambulance chaser” information without having to hunt in case you are premature as well and your story falls off Google News.

Hope you have a nice cell mate.

Constitution and Bill of Rights
CONSTITUTION
Enticy Institute
Enticy Institute
American Health Care
American Health Care
IQ Test
IQ TEST

Categories

Subscribe To Updates

Notifications when something posts.
Loading

History

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

Search

Text Size

  • 100%  110%  125%  140%  

https://rumble.com/vsrrse-courts-know-whats-coming.html
https://rumble.com/v5w1g65-first-and-second-scotus-petitions-video-in-re-lee-kent-hempfling-et-ux..html

Most Excellent Keyword Things

are (176) Arizona (85) attorney (76) case (110) circuit (74) court (111) did (103) do (99) does (116) Don (79) even (98) federal (84) government (83) have (122) Hempfling (75) I (127) just (129) know (115) law (90) like (100) long (80) means (77) nbsp (106) new (85) no (167) office (94) order (81) people (111) Person (101) process (85) public (74) right (87) see (112) State (105) States (105) stop (74) thing (97) think (78) time (132) United (90) United States (88) use (96) used (94) v (87) years (98)
Copyright © 1992 - 2025 Lee Kent Hempfling All Rights Reserved
Copyrights are owned by the respective creator. Uses are by fair use parody.